Understanding The Sniper’s Point Of View While Understanding What Happened In Charlie Kirk Tour ?

People have become disheartened after what happened at the Charlie Kirk tour. The conservative activist was assassinated during his campus tour at Utah Valley University (UVU) in Orem.  

As the Americans mourn his death, people often skip the technicalities and the investigative perspective on the entire thing. It has been quite a while since the 22-year-old Tylor Robinson turned himself in to the police.  

However, most people have overlooked the investigative part of the event from a sniper’s point of view. Thus, we at Big Jar News have tried to cover the conversation between Jeremy Rebmann and Mike Ritland.   

The former special agent gives his perspective on the Charlie Kirk assassination in a podcast on Mike Ritland’s YouTube channel.   

This article, moreover, seeks to break down the entire conversation and the details that were discussed in it. Moreover, we shall provide you with the Big Jar perspective on the course of events related to Charlie Kirk’s death. 

What Was The Podcast About On The YouTube Channel Of Milke Ritland?  

Moreover, the conversation covered several things. The former special agent talked about the FBI sniper’s perspective in the entire investigation. Furthermore, the host of the Show initiated the conversation by asking Jeremy Rebmann if the FBI had contacted anyone with his level of expertise to assist with the investigation. 

Moreover, Jeremy Rebmann replied to this, stating that he retired almost three years ago. Thus, he believes that the FBI will probably use one of their snipers. 

The former sniper stated that he had an interview in the lineup. However, they had cancelled it, saying that people were not perceiving snipers positively. The interviewers told him that people consider snipers as “murderers”. 

Moreover, Jeremy Rebmann expressed his regret and felt a bit frustrated by the overall generalization following the Charlie Kirk case. 

1. Did The Former Sniper Have Any Insights On The Charlie Kirk Assassination Investigation?  

The host of the show asked the former FBI sniper if he knew anyone within the FBI team who had insights about the Charlie Kirk assassination.  

However, Jeremy Rebmann stated that there was nothing that was not already in the public domain.   

He also replied that he has talked to several people, including the snipers.   

However, what he learned was already in the public domain. 

2. How Did The Assassin Get The Weapon To The Spot Of Murder? 

Mike highlighted that the gun that was found was a Mauser 98 Bolt-Action. However, the gun is heavy, and it should take a certain amount of time to get the gun to the spot. 

Moreover, Mike also talked about the footage that has surfaced on the internet, where the assassin could be seen jumping off the roof. However, Ritland expressed confusion about the authenticity of the footage. 

But police found the weapon hundreds of meters away from the place where the incident must have taken place. 

Thus, the host asked raised questions about the practicality of what happened. Thus, he asked for Jeremy’s perspective on this.  

The former sniper replied, saying that it seemed bizarre to him as a whole. Jeremy expressed his distrust related to what is reported. Moreover, he said that the media always tries to get “ bits and pieces” from what they find. 

Thus, this becomes even more scandalous. The former sniper stated that it was important to “withhold judgment”. Moreover, people should not form any opinion based on the information that is provided by the media reports. 

Jeremy Rebmann stated that the media often get high ratings for some of the most scandalous reports that they make.  

3. Is It Possible For A Person To Do What Was Shown In The Media Report And The Videos? 

Mike raised questions about whether it was at all possible for the killer to actually get a Mauser bolt-action gun to the spot of the Charlie Kirk tour, then put it on an elevated platform, and then jump off the roof in a jacket. Moreover, after a few hours, the gun was found in a tree concealed under a jacket.  

The media reports stated that the tree was almost 100 yards away from the location of the crime.  

Moreover, this made things even more bizarre to believe.  

The former FBI special agent replied, stating that he had been investigating for the last twenty-five years.   

However, Jeremy Rebmann stated that he deeply suspends judgment for as long as possible. He also said that he used to follow the lead when investigating any case. However, he always remained open to other possibilities during the case.  

He also expressed his faith in the federal court system.  Moreover, Jeremy Rebmann stated that the Jury goes through all the possible evidence and the information. Then, break things part by part to arrive at the relevant conclusion. 

The Big Jar Take On What Happened During The Charlie Kirk Tour?

We at Big Jar News definitely agree with what Jeremy Rebmann said. Moreover, the media channels prioritize their ratings above all else. Thus, the viewers should avoid forming any bias based on the media reports. 

However, the investigations by the Federal Court happen through various procedural nuances. Thus, people should wait before arriving at any conclusion. 

Hence, people should specifically wait for reports from the government and the FBI instead of relying on information from YouTube and TV News reports. 

Moreover, it is important to watch different types of News Channels. Several News Channels have various kinds of biases depending on whether they are left-leaning or right-leaning.  

People should go through several types of news to ultimately reach a conclusion. Moreover, the results should be somewhere in between.  

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Here are the answers to some of the most commonly asked questions related to  Charlie Kirk’s assassination and the Charlie Kirk tour.