What Happened When Charlie Kirk Went On A Heated Argument With A College Student

The conservative activist Charlie Kirk was shot dead at Utah Valley University as he was conducting a live interaction event. 

However, after the demise of the conservative activist, the video of a female liberal student resurfaced on the internet. Moreover, people on the internet have started to search for the video while typing “Charlie Kirk flash.” 

The video shows when Vivek Ramaswami and Charlie Kirk went out for their “You are Brainwashed” Tour.  

Moreover, the supporters of Charlie Kirk were convinced that the video was aimed at banning Charlie Kirk’s YouTube channel. 

 Furthermore, the supporters of Charlie Kirk believe that the girl did it because nudity was banned on YouTube. 

However, several other websites host the video. People on the internet have started broadly looking for the video while searching “ Charlie Kirk Flash.”   

What Is The “Charlie Kirk Flash” Video?

Vivek Ramaswamy and Charlie Kirk, the two co-founders of “Turning Point USA, were on their tour. Moreover, they were visiting various college campuses all over the USA.  

In the meantime, the duo had a heated debate with a Liberal student on the campus. Moreover, the student argued on several relevant topics, like abortion rights and others. The student is identified by the name Jean. 

However, later in the video, the girl was seen flashing at Ramaswamy and Charlie Kirk. Moreover, this was one of the most awkward moments.  

What Was The Discussion About in The Charlie Kirk Flash Video?

Moreover, the discussion in the video started like a heckle match between them. However, Vivek Ramaswamy also later joined in. 

1. Should A 30-Year-Old Debate College Students?

The student asked Charlie if he feels ” proud” of himself while talking to college kids. Moreover, the student suggested that Charlie and Ramaswamy should be ashamed of themselves for talking to college kids who remain unprepared. 

Jean also pointed out that Charlie was 30 years old, and hence she feels that it is a bit silly. Therefore, the student suggested that it was “ silly” for a 30-year-old to debate young children. 

However, Charlie replied to this while asking the student if she was a voter or not. The liberal student reapplied to this while saying that she is a voter. 

 Moreover, Charlie justified his act of debating with the students while saying that he was talking to the voters of this country who would “shape the Western civilization.” 

Charlie also asked how it was any different from a “professor talking to the students”?  

2. Who Are You? Charlie Kirk Flash Video

The student later mockingly asked Charlie Kirk, “Who are you?”. However, Charlie replied to this while saying that he was” important enough” for her to come to the microphone. 

The girl stated that she thought that it was an “improved comedy” for the first time when she saw the advertisement. Moreover, she did not even think of it as “real”. However, Charlie pointed at the cheering crowd behind her.  

Therefore, Charlie pointed out that Trump was really popular on her campus and hence asked her how it made her feel. 

The conservative speaker stated that this was not “comedy”. He referred to the popularity of Trump on campus as a “fight-alarm-fire” for Kamla Haris. Moreover, he suggested that Kamla Harris was supposed to lose Pennsylvania. 

3. What Dangerous Agenda Was Kirk Pushing For? What Did Vivek Ramaswamy Say

In the Charlie Kirk flash video, the female student can be seen that Kirk was actually pushing for a dangerous agenda. 

 So far, the debate and the argument have remained limited between Charlie and Jean (the student). However, Ramaswamy decided to participate in the discussion. Vivek asked what the student knew about the stance of the current republican party towards “federal intervention in abortion.”? 

Ramaswamy also pointed out that the Republican Party was against the federal abortion ban. However, Jean replied to this while stating that she understands that. 

Moreover, Vivek then appreciated that the student was challenging Charlie. Ramaswamy also appreciated that Charlie was willing to take it to different campuses while discussing the subject. 

However, Ramaswamy then asks what the disagreement was on content. Vivek pointed out that people can have disagreements in terms of the style of conversation. 

However, his main question was what the problem was with discussion or a dialogue with the next generation. 

Replying to this, the student in the Charlie Kirk Flash video suggested that she does not like the way the conversation gets edited. 

The student expresses a problem with how people are made to look bad after editing. However, Charlie stated that they post unedited content. 

4. Where Is The Disagreement? 

Ramaswamy also asked the student about his disagreements with Charlie Kirk, Donald Trump ,and also himself, suggesting that he ran for the presidential candidate last year. 

Vivek also asks, Where does the student disagree with the entire conservative movement? However, answering this, Jean replied that she does not like how the movement has turned against the LGBTQA community. 

 Ramaswamy later addressed the issue of the LGBTQA community. Ramaswamy states that if a person is a fully grown adult, then that person is allowed to marry whoever they want, dress up however they want. 

However, people should not indoctrinate children in school who are not of the age of consent. 

Vivek also suggested that men over 18 are free to become women. However, they can not change their language. Men can not enter the women’s locker room or compete with another woman in sports. 

What Is The Big Jar Take On The” Charlie Kirk Flash Video”? And The Things Which Were Discussed On The Video?

Charlie Kirk supporters called out Jean for flashing on the camera to block Charlie from YouTube. However, Jean admitted several times that she was nervous. Moreover, her voice, tonality, hand gestures, and everything all along suggested that she was nervous. 

Thus, we at Big Jar believe that this could be an unintentional mistake by her. However, people on social media often indulge in harsh trolling for a wardrobe malfunction.  

What Vivek Ramaswamy stated in the video is also relevant. Ramaswamy said that an 18-year-old should be allowed to decide his or her sexual orientation. 

However, children discover their sexuality before they reach the age of consent. Moreover, the laws of nature do not abide by societal rules. 

Hence, growing adults should have genuine knowledge of what is natural and what is not a crime. Moreover, people do not wait for their children to grow 18 before teaching them about religion. Majorly, people want their children to inherit their religious values. 

However, the children of growing age should know that it is not a crime if they have a sexual orientation that attracts them towards people of their own gender. Boys of growing age should learn that it is not unnatural to be attracted to other boys. 

Moreover, institutions should teach young adults that their sexual orientation is not unnatural. 

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Here are the answers to some of the most commonly asked questions related to Charlie Kirk, Vivek Ramaswamy, and the Charlie Kirk Flash Video